<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effort Forming To Oppose Anti-Transit Parking Initiative</title>
	<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/</link>
	<description>A transit riders' association for San Francisco</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-126</link>
		<author>Don</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>The proposal may be flawed but we need more parking. I favor both improved pubic transit and more parking. I use both. Most of the arguments against the proposal are speculative and tell me things like that if I favor the proposal I am against trees. I am also told I should be against the proposal because some rich guy backs it. It seems to me that a lower supply means a higher cost so that only the rich will be able to afford to park their cars. If we want to get people out of their cars, improve public transit. Taking a position against cars will not improve MUNI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposal may be flawed but we need more parking. I favor both improved pubic transit and more parking. I use both. Most of the arguments against the proposal are speculative and tell me things like that if I favor the proposal I am against trees. I am also told I should be against the proposal because some rich guy backs it. It seems to me that a lower supply means a higher cost so that only the rich will be able to afford to park their cars. If we want to get people out of their cars, improve public transit. Taking a position against cars will not improve MUNI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Examiner Slams Parking Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-125</link>
		<author>Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Examiner Slams Parking Initiative</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] profiled the so-called &#8220;Parking for Neighborhoods&#8221; initiative today.  The initiative, opposed by Rescue Muni and many others, is &#8220;a veritable minefield of unintended consequences. &#8230; Incredibly, the initiative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] profiled the so-called &#8220;Parking for Neighborhoods&#8221; initiative today.  The initiative, opposed by Rescue Muni and many others, is &#8220;a veritable minefield of unintended consequences. &#8230; Incredibly, the initiative [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Son of Muni Reform Goes to the Ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-123</link>
		<author>Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Son of Muni Reform Goes to the Ballot</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] the hard part: This measure, because of the parking limitation language, which runs counter to the pro-parking, anti-transit ballot measure also appearing on the November ballot, will be more controversial than was Prop E. The supporters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the hard part: This measure, because of the parking limitation language, which runs counter to the pro-parking, anti-transit ballot measure also appearing on the November ballot, will be more controversial than was Prop E. The supporters [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
