<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effort Forming To Oppose Anti-Transit Parking Initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/</link>
	<description>A transit riders' association for San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>The proposal may be flawed but we need more parking. I favor both improved pubic transit and more parking. I use both. Most of the arguments against the proposal are speculative and tell me things like that if I favor the proposal I am against trees. I am also told I should be against the proposal because some rich guy backs it. It seems to me that a lower supply means a higher cost so that only the rich will be able to afford to park their cars. If we want to get people out of their cars, improve public transit. Taking a position against cars will not improve MUNI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposal may be flawed but we need more parking. I favor both improved pubic transit and more parking. I use both. Most of the arguments against the proposal are speculative and tell me things like that if I favor the proposal I am against trees. I am also told I should be against the proposal because some rich guy backs it. It seems to me that a lower supply means a higher cost so that only the rich will be able to afford to park their cars. If we want to get people out of their cars, improve public transit. Taking a position against cars will not improve MUNI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Examiner Slams Parking Initiative</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Examiner Slams Parking Initiative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] profiled the so-called &#8220;Parking for Neighborhoods&#8221; initiative today.  The initiative, opposed by Rescue Muni and many others, is &#8220;a veritable minefield of unintended consequences. &#8230; Incredibly, the initiative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] profiled the so-called &#8220;Parking for Neighborhoods&#8221; initiative today.  The initiative, opposed by Rescue Muni and many others, is &#8220;a veritable minefield of unintended consequences. &#8230; Incredibly, the initiative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Son of Muni Reform Goes to the Ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Rescue Muni &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Son of Muni Reform Goes to the Ballot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2007/07/30/effort-forming-to-oppose-anti-transit-parking-initiative/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] the hard part: This measure, because of the parking limitation language, which runs counter to the pro-parking, anti-transit ballot measure also appearing on the November ballot, will be more controversial than was Prop E. The supporters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hard part: This measure, because of the parking limitation language, which runs counter to the pro-parking, anti-transit ballot measure also appearing on the November ballot, will be more controversial than was Prop E. The supporters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

