<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fed&#8217;s funding boosts fare gate upgrade project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/</link>
	<description>A transit riders' association for San Francisco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crzwdjk</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4220</link>
		<dc:creator>crzwdjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4220</guid>
		<description>London does not have turnstiles at every station, only at the central ones. Many suburban stations have open access to the platforms, and some mainline rail stations have faregates, while most do not. Same goes for the RER in Paris. In Boston and Philadelphia (which have subway-surface systems very much like the Muni Metro), the underground stations have turnstiles, and the above-ground stations have bus style pay-as-you-board, although Boston seems to be moving in the direction of a more POP-like system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>London does not have turnstiles at every station, only at the central ones. Many suburban stations have open access to the platforms, and some mainline rail stations have faregates, while most do not. Same goes for the RER in Paris. In Boston and Philadelphia (which have subway-surface systems very much like the Muni Metro), the underground stations have turnstiles, and the above-ground stations have bus style pay-as-you-board, although Boston seems to be moving in the direction of a more POP-like system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdinsf</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4194</link>
		<dc:creator>rdinsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4194</guid>
		<description>But, in my experience underground/elevated rail systems have proof of payment or turnstiles, not both.  

For example, Vancouver, B.C. and Berlin have proof of payment and not turnstiles.  Paris, London, New York have turnstiles but no proof of payment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, in my experience underground/elevated rail systems have proof of payment or turnstiles, not both.  </p>
<p>For example, Vancouver, B.C. and Berlin have proof of payment and not turnstiles.  Paris, London, New York have turnstiles but no proof of payment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4186</guid>
		<description>Also the faregates are better at keeping obvious non-payers out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also the faregates are better at keeping obvious non-payers out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markballew</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4185</link>
		<dc:creator>markballew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4185</guid>
		<description>I imagine the gates are still required for passengers to pay with some sort of single fare media, probably magstripe paper similar to the Madrid Metro. There&#039;s a demo unit from San Diego being shown today at Van Ness station, see the article for details when that will be shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine the gates are still required for passengers to pay with some sort of single fare media, probably magstripe paper similar to the Madrid Metro. There&#8217;s a demo unit from San Diego being shown today at Van Ness station, see the article for details when that will be shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rdinsf</title>
		<link>http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4183</link>
		<dc:creator>rdinsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rescuemuni.org/2009/08/19/feds-funding-boosts-fare-gate-upgrade-project/#comment-4183</guid>
		<description>Given that the underground is a &quot;proof of payment&quot; area, why spend all that money on turnstiles?  A post where you tag a card has got to be much cheaper than a turnstile (as they have on GG Transit)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the underground is a &#8220;proof of payment&#8221; area, why spend all that money on turnstiles?  A post where you tag a card has got to be much cheaper than a turnstile (as they have on GG Transit)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

