« Examiner: Prop G and disciplinary process for operators
Our stance on the N-Judah Express (Nx) »

TWU: Prop G illegal, so suspend federal $

The Transport Workers Union has submitted a letter to the Department of Labor demanding that federal funding for SFMTA projects be suspended, based on the claim that Proposition G illegally requires an arbitrator to prioritize “the public interest in efficient and reliable transit.”

This is clearly a negotiating tactic, but it could lead the feds to suspend over $4 billion in capital funding for Central Subway and major maintenance projects.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 24th, 2011 at 10:40 am and is filed under Muni Reform, Prop G. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • Don E

    Isn’t that cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face? However, some may rejoice if the feds suspend funds for the subway.

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • angrytaxguy2011

    prop g violates 13c,it violates safety issues in scheduling and it does not replace defective coaches that exist as i type this…planned fare increases are due july 1…who will they blame…u already know

  • Pingback: Rescue Muni » Blog Archive » TWU 250A members reject proposed contract